ruchi
New Member
Posts: 14
|
Post by ruchi on Nov 18, 2015 2:20:52 GMT
Something interesting that we didn’t really talk much about in class is Antoinette’s connection to nature. Brought up in Dominica, it only seems natural that Antoinette is quite close with the flora and fauna surrounding her at a young age. Even when she leaves the island, she seems to find Rochester’s garden a safe spot to her, away from the people in Thornfield Hall. For me, I think that her coherence with her natural surroundings may be a compensation for her inability to communicate and connect to other people throughout her life. In the absence of love and God in Antoinette’s life, nature is the one thing she can always depend on. The systematic rules of nature are something that she can understand and deal with even in its harshest settings, although she doesn’t seem to be able to with society in most settings. Her oneness with nature seems consistent with her logical frame of mind, and it is something that is easier for her to understand than people. Interestingly, Rochester, on the other hand, hates nature. He is confused and astounded by it. I think that Rochester finds nature undesirable because nature is one of the few things that Rochester is unable to control himself, which scares and overwhelms him. He is better with a more civilized order of rules, and the unpredictability and power of nature is something he cannot suppress.
|
|
|
Post by jzhangx3 on Nov 18, 2015 23:19:05 GMT
Wow I love the ideas in this post! I want to add on that both Jane and Antoinette adore and understand nature, while Rochester hates the mysterious, secretive ways of nature, showing the differences and inevitable conflicts between Rochester and his lovers. Nature, in a way, is passion, an outlet for Jane and Antoinette. Rochester desires orderly, simplistic ideas over the uncontrollable, wild ways of nature. Nature, therefore, is also a symbol of the modern woman, of the woman that both Antoinette and Jane had in them (Jane somewhat suppressed it, though), of the woman that Charlotte Bronte wanted to create: the independent, free, passionate, and intellectual woman. Furthermore, Antoinette came from a colorful nature in Dominica, and thus she embodies the characteristics of nature -- dark, unexplored, and threatening. Even the name of the novel, "Wide Sargasso Sea," alludes to the ever-changing, deep and secretive part of nature – the sea that separates Antoinette’s home island and England. Lastly, in Jane Eyre, when Rochester and Jane profess their love for each other and agree to get married, the tree in Rochester's garden is struck by lightning and splits in half, suggesting that the tree, as a part of nature and representing Jane, was dying: Jane's passion and self-respect was being killed (she was "killed into passivity" by Rochester) by agreeing to the marriage, and Rochester, representing a hatred of nature and the lightning in this scenario, was dominant and asserted his powers over Jane by winning her hand in marriage.
|
|
|
Post by margaretpalko on Nov 20, 2015 21:41:46 GMT
To either Jen or Ruchi, do you think if we read Antointette's story we would find reoccurring symbols of nature? Nature was a giant part of Jane Eyre and since you both bring it up, it wouldn't strike me as odd if it was in "Wide Sargasso Sea".
|
|
ruchi
New Member
Posts: 14
|
Post by ruchi on Nov 21, 2015 20:47:01 GMT
Margaret, I think if we read the story, I'd put my money on the assumption that nature would play a big role in Wide Sargasso Sea. Like Jen said, nature is almost an extension of Antoinette's character, so I think we could see her feelings/emotions through the environment outside. Like I said before, since Antoinette was from Dominica, the sea and jungles/gardens are a huge part of her upbringing, so it would make sense that we see symbols of nature in the book.
@jen I like your explanation of tree! I hadn't looked at it in that angle. I feel like in the 'Jane Eyre' we can even see nature in the titles of the places she stays at with Rochester, "Thornfield" and "Ferndean." These names bring up vivid imagery that somewhat characterize the places. "Thornfield" connotates prickers that could possibly scratch or snare a person, and "Ferndean" brings a nicer, soothing image in mind.
|
|