|
Post by gerryliu on Nov 18, 2015 22:55:04 GMT
One of the main ideas from the 19th century "Madwoman in the Attic" was the idea of a "perfect" or "model woman" that influenced the attitudes of all of those that lived during that time period. This "model woman" was "pure, submissive, decorous, and even angelic" (168) and this ideal was predominately strived for by the majority of woman of the time, otherwise the woman was a whore or demon (no one wants to be looked at like that). In today's society, we look back at those standards and laugh off how ridiculous they were, but have we really changed at all?
In many regards, we have vastly changed our outlook on a "model woman" and we have greatly shifted our views towards equality for both sexes. However, this idea of a "model woman" still exists today and influences our outlook on women that do not fit the bill. A great example of a "model woman" is the beauty standards in Korea. Almost all the young women in Korea try to make themselves fit a mold that is decided by current society. (Just google a kpop girl group and tell me they don't all look the same) The situation in Korea is that girls will do lots of things to try to "fit it". This is the main reason why plastic surgery rates in Korea are the highest in the world. Although not as extreme, America also falls into this situation.
However, havering a "model women" is not a bad thing. It gives society an identity and gives individuals (ironic) a goal to achieve. Furthermore, today's society handles those who aren't really on the "perfect" side of the spectrum relatively well. We can fall into the middle (like Jane) and still be respected in society.
While many of us will agree society has not reached an "equilibrium of the sexes", we have certainly taken leaps to fix our past. Although the extreme anglic vs devilish attitude towards women is now gone, our society still embodies this model with lots more dilution.
|
|
|
Post by joshualiu on Nov 19, 2015 22:20:51 GMT
Gerry, you said that a 19th century model woman was pure and submissive, completely on one side of the spectrum. However, I feel like a model woman has changed to have a balance of the good traits of each side. For example, being pure and self-sacrificing, along with passionate would fit more of the standard, rather than being passionless.
|
|
|
Post by reshmabelur on Nov 19, 2015 22:36:58 GMT
Gerry, I think beauty icons have evolved over the ages and I agree with you in that they are not necessarily negative. The beauty industry is merely an industry and provides both women and men opportunities to alter their appearance in accordance with their personal desires. The concept of the existence of a "model" woman as a goal for all women has definitely subsided (glad you acknowledge it) and differs between cultures. Girls and boys are capable of freely expressing themselves and are hardly chided for not fitting a certain mold. Although a lot of kpop girls look alike, several other trends are present in Korean pop culture. Here in America, women and men of all walks of life (Tyra Banks, Taylor Swift, Oprah Winfrey, and Mark Zuckerburg) are considered icons for our youth. Do you feel as though those who don't follow this standard are shunned, Josh?
|
|
amyyu
New Member
Posts: 20
|
Post by amyyu on Nov 19, 2015 23:44:25 GMT
Reshma, even though your question is directed towards Josh, I think that women who don't follow standards in society aren't necessarily shunned. In fact, society might view them as the exact opposite and associate these women with originality. With the refusal to conform to society's standards, the general population these days will most likely also respect them more so than women who pretend to be someone that they're not and get multiple plastic surgeries as well as botox injections.
In the media today, we see that many celebrities whose plastic surgeries surface and become known to the public are actually shammed. This could be society's method to try to persuade women to ignore standards and ideals, and instead focus on more important things, such as personality and self-identity. In addition, celebrities who have never gone under the knife and seem genuine tend to receive more favor and support from their audience. This is very interesting because in the nineteenth- century, people usually looked down upon women who didn't adjust their personalities or appearance to meet the demands that society put on women. Now, society applauds women who stray along the borders of accepted behavior for women and view them as role models. Even though many women in the kpop industry, as Gerry said, continue to try their best to fit the "model woman" role in Korea, in general society has become more lenient and accepting towards those who are different. These days, many people appreciate women who are unique and don't resort to artificial means to achieve beauty standards or alter their personality to fit in with all of the other high-spirited and bubbly people in the entertainment industry.
Today, many people mock beauty standards which they deem to be ridiculous, such as getting lip injections to achieve fuller lips like Kylie Jenner. Some women who may not have the means to get these injections have resorted to trying the "Kylie Jenner lip challenge" to temporarily get lips similar to Kylie's (which aren't natural anyway). The disappointment from the general public is seen all over social media, where many people voice their disapproval and ridicule women who have attempted this challenge.
|
|
|
Post by harleen5 on Nov 20, 2015 2:04:28 GMT
Amy, I agree with your ideas of how the media tends to shun those who go under the knife to receive plastic surgery. However, I do feel that there is still pressure on woman to meet a standard today. Even though the media always applauds those who refuse to change their appearance, they also are quick to point out flaws in celebrities and scrutinize them. For example, today many tabloids have articles about a celebrity stepping outside without makeup on as if it is a scandal.
|
|
|
Post by ndefilippis on Nov 20, 2015 2:57:13 GMT
Gerry, I think that the idea of a "model woman" will eventually coincide with a "model person". In the time period when Jane Eyre was written, a model woman as viewed as pure and angelic. In the time when Wide Sargasso Sea was written, the idea of a "model woman" had changed drastically. Today, I think that a "model woman" is more similar to the idea of a "model person". In today's society, I feel like there is less of a gap between the roles of women and men. For example, in Victorian England, women were expected to stay home and take care of the man in the family. But today, either man or woman could work while the other takes care of the family, or both could work. This changing of roles represents a shift towards equality in the roles of women and men.
|
|
|
Post by oliviamccubbins on Nov 21, 2015 1:15:12 GMT
I agree that there are still model women and beauty standards but I also think that as Amy said that women who do try to fit this mold are shunned. I think the new model women is one who does not conform to beauty standards. Everyone wants to stand out and those who give into things like plastic surgery are viewed as weak. Look at the current models and Barbie dolls out. Everyone is calling for diversity and to be different than everyone else. That's what I think the current ideal women is. But I also agree that the model women and model person are so much close than before. However a model women today are hard-working and shouldn't want to stay home. I think we have moved in a totally different direction from the time Jane Eyre was. Some is good and bad. Women shouldn't be shunned for wanting to be their version of pretty nor should they be looked down upon for choosing not to work.
|
|
amyyu
New Member
Posts: 20
|
Post by amyyu on Nov 21, 2015 15:14:09 GMT
Nick, I think you made a good point about how today's idea of a "model woman" is becoming more similar to the idea of a "model person". This may mean that society is converging the roles and ideals of women and men into one. Today, the standards for women have shifted from those in the nineteenth century and are now entirely different. As Olivia said, the ideal woman today is someone who is driven and hard-working. This is very different from what women were expected to be like in the times of Jane Eyre. In Victorian times, the ideal women was fragile, submissive, and self-sacrificing to their husbands. However, today's ideals have changed from characteristics that are quite shallow to those that demand perseverance and strength from women. This current standard can be not only applied to women but also to men, representing the gradually shift towards equality in the standards of men and women.
It's important to note that standards and ideals will never fully dissolve from society since people are naturally inclined to criticize the categorize others around them. However, with the convergence of male and female ideals, it shows how society is no longer viewing women as weak individuals. Instead, they are seen as people who are capable of achieving similar levels of success as men, which explains why the "model woman" has shifted to the "model person".
|
|
|
Post by carlsonchris on Nov 23, 2015 3:05:57 GMT
Olivia I would argue that diversity is not as highly regarded as you would think. I just googled "most beautiful women in the world" and the first five results are pale white brunettes. Society in general always gravitates toward a particular archetype for both men and women. On the other hand, a lot of different forms of personality are acceptable. Both the submissive housewife and the modern type-A woman are both regarded as good in their own right. We as a society have become a lot more accepting of all different types of people even if we prefer they look a certain way.
|
|