|
Post by ndefilippis on Sept 24, 2015 22:15:35 GMT
Characterization plays an important role in "The Accident". There are two main characters that are characterized, yourself, and the teenage boy in the crash. At first, the narrator, or you, is indirectly characterized as sympathetic and docile. You think how "they have every right to be upset, or livid, or even violence-contemplating". You are ready to accept the consequences of this accident, including physical punishment by these teenagers. As the story progresses, you are directly characterized as being lonely, and without much contact. This makes you a dynamic character, changing from sympathetic to longing for any and all human contact. This lonliness could also be the motivation as to why you were so sympathetic. You so desperately wanted human contact that any contact at all, even something as bad and harmful as a car accident made you happy.
A foil to your character is that of the teenager. He is a flat character that serves the purpose to contrast your desperation for human contact. He is brash, and angry, exclaiming how he "just bought that car today". He is angry that you hit his car, and pays no attention to the fact that you are very lonely. He is also a static character, he does not change at all throughout the story, remaining brash and arrogant. The only purpose he serves in the story is to contrast your lonely attitude.
|
|
|
Post by carlsonchris on Sept 25, 2015 3:15:02 GMT
To expand on Nick's ideas, you can also see the reasons for his loneliness in his actions and thoughts. The author reveals how he looks down on the teenager for his choice of car and seems to automatically dismiss him. This suggests he is elitist and has a high sense of self which can drive people away. Direct and indirect characterization both help develop the character fully and give meaning to the entire story.
|
|
|
Post by gerryliu on Sept 25, 2015 12:49:11 GMT
Something interesting about the protagonist, yourself, is that he is conflicted on his view of the teenagers. In one sentence he says, "You are a bad person" and feel sympathetic for the teens. Then in the lines following the bad person line, he goes on to bad mouth the teenager's car which he had just wrecked. Then as the story goes on he realizes that the teenager is a nice kid. This series of events I think creates a situation that the author wanted to convey. It creates the "judging a book by its cover" idea that people instinctively do, even if they know it to be bad. This creates a sense of relativity to the protagonist. Eggers uses the idea that humans will instinctively make judgements and shows this through yourself.
|
|